Why Liberated Young Ladies Do Not Have My Support

Tell Men Not To Rape

If the word helplessness has ever had any definite meaning to me, it meant waking up at midnight, insisting that I want to sleep with my young aunt. I still remember the confusion, and helplessness. To me, happiness meant being allowed to sleep with her. Children take delight in such petty vices. My mother knew this. When I grew up, one day I would talk to my class teacher in baby class. She felt that even today, decades later, I speak the same way I spoke to her when I was three. Within us, there is a child that refuses to grow up.

Once, a young colleague wanted to know what the word “molestation” meant. When I said, “It is something which women face in the buses, trains and crowded roads. It is every man’s fantasy. But, I would never attempt that because I value my life, reputation and health very highly.” she screamed her empty heads off that I have destroyed the reputation of South Indians.

But, if there is a child who takes delight in petty vices inside all of us, a child that refuses to grow up, this should not be surprising. Men love physical contact with women. Such is human nature. People find this truth offensive. I do not know why. Morality is about controlling such impulses. This is one of the reasons I consider myself a moral man, unlike men who do wrong things.

People are very judgmental about things that should not matter to them in the first place. When I was in school, I once told a boy that if you place a chocolate bar in front of a child, he will find it tempting. We were talking about Bill Clinton. In their lives, people are continuously tempted to jump the fence, to cross the boundaries. So, it is not surprising that many do.

What if children are never allowed to have chocolates, when there are chocolate bars everywhere on the street, with moralistic labels stuck on them: “Do not touch“? I have no doubt that most children would feel that self-interest should triumph over morality. I think this is why men in India are often tempted to touch women without their permission.

Are women angels? No. They are just different in their liking for petty vices. I remember an aunt who spanked me when I was 17, for playing cricket inside the home with my little cousins. She was in her 20’s, and I have no doubt that she did it for the fun of it. I remember that when I was eighteen, a young aunt was talking to me, and her hand was on my lap. Many teachers in my school punished us only to enjoy themselves. When I graduated from high school, what made me happy was that I escaped these nasty women. But, the cause of innocent children forced to attend school was never hip. The reason I am sad today is that I did not get enough of all that I liked.

I am not drawing attention to the worst specimen among women. This is how people are, men or women, in their full normalcy. People do not notice.

As the great Murray Rothbard pointed out: “It has been noted for years—and especially by Europeans and Asians—that too many American men live in a matriarchy, dominated first by Momism, then by female teachers, and then by their wives.” Murray Rothbard wrote this before I was born, but I think this is increasingly becoming true in India.

When I was in high school, my idea of amusement was placing my feet beneath the bench of the girls who sit in front of me. One of them used to giggle, placing her slipper heels on my shoes, and a boy near me often warned me: “She will slap you!”. I am yet to understand why people are moralistic about all this. Perhaps this explains my ambivalent attitude towards some popular causes.

Murray Rothbard was right when he said: “Woman as “sex objects”? Of course they are sex objects and, praise the Lord, they always will be. Just as men, of course, are sex objects to women. As for the wolf whistles, it is impossible for any meaningful relationship to be established on the street or by looking at ads, and so in these roles women properly remain solely as sex objects. When deeper relationships are established between men and women, they each become more than sex objects to each other; they each hopefully become love objects as well. It would seem banal even to bother mentioning this, but in today’s increasingly degenerate intellectual climate no simple truths can any longer be taken for granted.” I think this is also why some women on Facebook with homosexual tendencies nurture some secret resentment towards me.

Are women less aggressive? Perhaps, but many women I have seen were very aggressive—Like the “editor”, “Miss Handicrafts” in the career Magazine I worked with. But, I am not going to tell you which Magazine it is because you will put that in Google and find out who she is. In fact, she was more aggressive than any man in that Magazine. But, when the publisher steps into the office, her voice becomes as soft as that of the kitten my brother dumped in the canal near our home.

One day, after working for two days straight, I came to the office to write my darling novel. Miss Handicrafts sent a little girl to ask me to do some low IQ work. I said, “I will not be doing it”. The little girl made a funny face and left. After that Miss Handicrafts messaged me on Google talk saying that I have to go in front of her and say that I cannot do this. I thought, “Good God! Dominatrix fetish!” and said, “Of course, I will.” When I went near her and questioned her, she understood that things are going beyond her control. She said apprehensively, “Dude, chill. Nothing happened.” After that, she did not have the nerve to ask me to do low IQ work. That is all such women are good for.

I heard that she told the little girl and others in a conspiratorial manner, hiding her embarrassment: “You can give him low IQ work, but I will tell you when the right time is.” Later when I saw her, she was playing with her puppies, and she was not even looking at my face. That is how I escaped low IQ work. No man has ever had the nerve to directly ask for my respect, like these women. Men ask indirectly, though.

But, when I write hard facts about male-female differences on my Facebook wall, even women from parts of the world I have not heard of come there to abuse me, screaming that when there are men like me, it is hardly surprising that women are raped in Delhi. Many ask me: “Delhi? But, isn’t that a city where women often get raped? “When one such woman asked me, “Isn’t there a lack of respect towards women and children in your culture?” I replied, “Yes. My culture is backward. But, I am very advanced. My attitude towards women is not much different from my attitude towards babies. I treat them tenderly.” What marks these women is that they are not really honest about themselves.

12 comments

    I have no idea what this piece is about.

    Jacob | 4 years ago

    That is because you are an idiot.

    Shanu Athiparambath | 3 years ago

    You're not a very good writer. Your writing is full of contradictions and very biased, additionally you're unable to develop an understanding of the issue further than a 16 year old boy.

    Anonymous | 3 years ago

    I just completed a neuroscience course in university that studies sex differences in the brain. There is no evidence whatsoever of men being more intelligent than women. I will simplify so you are able to understand. Yes, male brains are larger but the neurons have a larger distance to cover, therefore the message is delayed. Women's brains are smaller but the messages are conveyed further. Therefore a women's brain is more energy efficient and faster than a male's brain. It is worthy to note that there has been no correlation between brain size and intelligence, for more information you can refer to the sizes of Einstein's brain (very average!) The woman at your work may be less intelligent than you but this is not a result of biology. As you are well aware of, in India women are still oppressed. In other countries women actually develop faster, so they are smarter in primary school. In secondary school both women and men are approximately equal. Interestingly, there is a major difference in anger and aggression between men and woman in that men are much more likely to lose their temper and are therefore more provoked by their emotions than women. This is because there are less neural connections between the frontal lobe (rational thought) and limbic system (emotional processing) for men. Especially in serial killers, most of whom are men, the connections between the aforementioned regions are sparse. I wonder what your thought on the matter would be if the roles were reversed. Also if your wish is become a writer (you're language and sentence structure is quite good) I recommend you try to develop a deeper understanding of controversial issues as you sound like a 14 year old having a good ol' rant. People don't become famous because they are 'shit stirrers' but if they offer another way of looking at an issue. No one will read your work if your main goal is to cause trouble and anger your readers and critics will not be so kind to you. Of course your argument has a point but you attempt to generalise women as being the 'big bad wolf'. The only people who will agree with you will be the uneducated who believe such things. My main point is that writers become famous not only for their writing style but the ideals that they express, so you're half way there.

    Anonymous | 3 years ago

    1) I never said that men are smarter than women. On the means, the IQs of men and women are almost the same. Men have a slightly high average IQ, but the difference is modest, and not really worth mentioning. But, the male variance is huge. There are more men with IQs greater than 140, and there are more men with IQs lower than 70. So, there are more male geniuses and there are more morons among men. This is the primary reason why there are far more highly successful men. On the top you have to be really smart, and you should have your priorities right. Women have more distractions too. 2) Men are more likely to lose their temper openly, and lose their temper in the public sphere. But, does that prove that men have less control over their emotions. Hardly. I think it is a lot more complex than that. Men, for instance are more rational when they reason, when they philosophize. Women use more covert tactics to express anger, of course. Inside homes, women are more aggressive than men. And if you look at say, murder inside families, women use more covert tactics like poisoning, while men stab their spouses with a knife or shoot them with a gun. Before blaming men for overt violence, think for a moment. What would be the motive of someone who stabs in anger? What would be the motive of someone who poisons? Women often poison, for insurance money and suchlike. It is hard to detect. No one known whether men or women do more murder because what women do is hard to detect. But, in spousal violence, we have good data. Read Roy F. Baumeister's and Warren Farrell's work on gender. 3) Every passage in this post can be substantiated, with facts, figures and arguments, which I might do in a separate post. Please leave your name and email when you post comments because I find your comments very interesting.

    Shanu Athiparambath | 3 years ago

    I find passive aggressive people less trust worthy and harmful than some people who use overt aggression. Especially people who use covert tactics to murder someone inflict as much harm. 1) Covert tactics involves planning. It also means that you are not comfortable expressing your anger, which means that you probably do not have a valid reason to hold anger. I do not wish to say that this is necessarily the reason. The people who are victims of passive aggression probably cannot complain openly because they are reading subtle cues and there is always plausible deniability. 2) Murdering someone for money, and murdering someone out of anger is different because when you are angry, it is possible that you have a valid reason to be angry. When you poison someone for money, well. Someone who is very angry for a good reason normally do not flesh out a detailed plan. They might, but they probably won't. More importantly, for people who think passive aggression as a way of living , it is hardly necessary to lose their temper. They are in that mode, and need not go off that mode to do something to someone. You can also see that they have less clarity of thought than the people who are not passive aggressive. The reason I think is that your priorities influence even the way you think in ideological issues. The people who are passive aggressive have to lie to themselves to lie to others. So, thinking clearly is not in their self-interest.

    Shanu Athiparambath | 3 years ago

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *